The Bitcoin Beacon
BIP-110 would filter data inscriptions from blocks. Its forced-activation clock runs out in weeks — with almost no miners aboard.
Bitcoin’s loudest fight this year isn’t about price. BIP-110 is a soft-fork proposal to filter “arbitrary data” — the inscription-style transactions that stuff images and files into blocks — and its activation code carries a deadline: a forced signaling window in early August, now under 10,000 blocks away.
Support is thin where it counts. Miner signaling sits near 5 EH/s — roughly half a percent of a 920 EH/s network. Node estimates are disputed, running anywhere from 2% to 17% depending on who is counting, and most of that runs Bitcoin Knots, the filtering-friendly alternative to Core.
Adam Back and Jameson Lopp — neither a fan of inscriptions — have called the activation parameters reckless, warning that a minority fork on a timer is precisely how chains split. If the window closes without majority hashrate, BIP-110 nodes could find themselves on their own chain: 2017’s user-activated brinkmanship, without 2017’s groundswell.
Nobody in this fight disagrees that bitcoin is money. They disagree over whether it may also be a filing cabinet.
Proponents answer that fees-as-filter has failed and node operators have every right to define what they relay. The counter: consensus rules enforced by a minority aren’t rules — they’re a schism.
Watch the signaling trackers, not the podcasts. If miner support stays in the low single digits into August, the likeliest outcome is an anticlimax — an activation that fizzles. The bigger precedent is quieter: deadlines are back as a bitcoin governance weapon.
Editor’s note: node-support estimates vary wildly (2%–17%) by methodology, and miner-signaling figures move daily — check the tracker before citing.
Free. Five minutes. No hype.
Subscribe free